Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brenda Fruhvirtova vs Rina Saigo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruhvirtova vs Saigo analysis and find out who is favored!
Brenda Fruhvirtova vs Rina Saigo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruhvirtova 1 - 0 Saigo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruhvirtova has won 44.73% of points on their second serve, while Saigo has won 45.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruhvirtova, in recent form, has won 58.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Saigo has won 54.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.38% and 42.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruhvirtova has saved 54.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Saigo has saved 52.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruhvirtova has won 82.76% of matches played (W/L 48/ 10), with Saigo winning 46.67% (W/L 28/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruhvirtova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 86% (W/L 87/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Saigo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 55/ 40), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruhvirtova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 94.44% of matches (W/L 34/ 2), where as Saigo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 20/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fruhvirtova winning 1 times and Saigo being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fruhvirtova winning 2 and Saigo winning 0. The last match between Fruhvirtova and Saigo was at the W25 Mogyorod, 18-08-2022, Second, Clay with Brenda Fruhvirtova getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fruhvirtova and Saigo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fruhvirtova winning 0 times and Saigo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fruhvirtova winning 0, and Saigo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruhvirtova has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.62 while Saigo has played against players with an average rank of 273.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruhvirtova has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Saigo has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruhvirtova has converted 50.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Saigo has converted 43.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
89
Rank
89
High
17
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
512
Rank
332
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
82% (111-25)
Career Total W/L
53% (149-130)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
47% (17-19)
$451,180
Career Prize Money
$16,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fruhvirtova VS Saigo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Brenda Fruhvirtova | Rina Saigo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (26/45) | 51% (27/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (20/26) | 37% (10/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (7/19) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (32/53) | 40% (18/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Fruhvirtova VS Saigo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Rina Saigo
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brenda Fruhvirtova | Rina Saigo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 47% (17/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) | 50% (40/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (189/159) | 51% (366/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 50% (17/17) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:3 | 1:50:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 137.89 | 253.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (725/1152) | 71% (1644/2316) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (467/725) | 57% (936/1644) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (191/427) | 45% (305/672) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (70/139) | 44% (148/338) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (496/1076) | 46% (1139/2454) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (11/16) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 47% (17/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 5% (20/1) |
Brenda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Taylor Townsend
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Oceane Dodin
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
15 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
51
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rina Saigo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Rina Saigo
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Rina Saigo
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
5
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Yujin Ahn
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Rina Saigo
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Rina Saigo
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Rina Saigo
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Rina Saigo
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
118)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Riko Kikawada
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Rina Saigo
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fruhvirtova Vs Saigo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
